Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Cobol > Re: Decimal ver...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 50 of 53 Topic 4077 of 4196
Post > Topic >>

Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"

by "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 5, 2008 at 05:34 PM

"Robert" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:qkodv3hre4a4oiv5h2dfn0bgod1ccmo5qa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:53:49 -0500, "HeyBub" <heybub@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>Robert wrote:
>>>
>>> You thought that because 'everyone knows' binary fractions are
>>> inaccurate. Some refuse to believe the number is an integer, not a
>>> fraction. That was my whole point -- we could have been storing
>>> currency amounts (dollars/pounds/zlotnys and cents) in binary all
>>> along. We never needed packed decimal. It was an IBM sales gimmick,
>>> and it worked.
>>
>>The alternative explanation was that the computer - first used in 
>>accounting
>>departments - had to exactly reproduce the results obtained by adding
>>machines and comptompters in order to be accepted in a commercial
>>enviornment. Therefore, IBM invested untold treasure and time to develop
>>circuitry to exactly mimic manual methods.
>>
>>But of course that's what you'd expect the Illuminati and the Freemasons

>>to
>>say, directed as they are by their alien overlords.
>
> That sort of ad hominem is what government and big cor****ations do when 
> caught in a lie to
> which they have no rational defense. Members of this august forum have 
> more artful
> responses.
>
> Robert: The sun rises in the east.
>
> WMK: Have you seen EVERY sunrise since the Earth's creation? No, so you 
> cannot generalize.
>
> DocD: I barely know what side of the bed *I* get out on, much less
anyone 
> else.
>
> Richard: Arrant nonsense. The azimuth of sunrise is generally toward the

> equator. We in
> the southern hemisphere see the sun rise in the NE or NNE. You Yanks in 
> northern latitudes
> see it in the SE. I long ago put this into a package that when called
with 
> a site's
> latitude and the date will output the sunrise azimuth accurate to six 
> digits. The original
> version was written in Basic for a Sinclair ZX81, where it took several 
> seconds to produce
> an answer. As a point of interest, if you are standing within 6 km of 
> either pole, you
> will actually see the sun rise in the west .. once per year.
>
> Howard: It rises over the 10th tee, which is eastward. Who cares exactly

> where it rises?
> My grandkids are more im****tant.
>
> Clark: If you can send me a dump taken at the instant of sunrise, I can 
> figure it out. If
> it was written in assembler, that would help.
>
> Frank: IBM hasn't updated the VSE sunrise functions in 15 years. All we 
> get are promises.
>
> Alistair: I didn't know that until I saw it on the Science Channel.
>
> PECD: That's only in your reality. We each have our own reality. In
mine, 
> the sun rises
> (or not) when and where I instantiate it. I don't use academic formulas 
> involving trig
> functions, I do it MY WAY. If you don't like it, I really don't give a 
> ****.
>
> HeyBub: Yeah, right, a vast conspiracy of One Worlders planned it all,
to 
> keep their foot
> on the neck of workers living west of the plant, by forcing them to
drive 
> into the sun in
> both directions. You should reinforce your tin hat with another layer of

> foil, to keep out
> thought control rays from the aliens. BTW, do you still think the moon 
> landing was faked
> and filmed in the desert?
>
>
LOL! Thank you for including me in the list :-)

I was starting to think I may have been coming here too long. Looks like 
that is the case.

Pete.
-- 
"I used to write COBOL...now I can do anything."
 




 53 Posts in Topic:
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 -
"Frank Swarbrick&quo  2008-04-01 13:14:46 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-04-01 19:29:05 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Binyamin Dissen <posti  2008-04-02 10:18:01 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 -
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-04-05 14:39:44 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-05 18:46:10 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 -
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-04-07 21:53:28 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 -
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-04-07 22:09:08 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-08 22:05:16 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-04-09 10:16:29 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 -
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-04-07 22:16:47 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/
Michael Wojcik <mwojci  2008-04-08 16:57:05 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 -
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-04-07 22:29:07 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-08 21:59:07 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 -
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-04-07 22:41:07 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 -
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-04-07 22:54:32 
Sampling accuracy and everyone being wrong was Re: Decimal vers
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-04-08 10:31:39 
Re: Sampling accuracy and everyone being wrong was Re: Decimal
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-08 14:48:38 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 -
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-04-08 21:41:10 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-09 19:19:26 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 -
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-04-09 18:45:59 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 -
"Frank Swarbrick&quo  2008-04-03 18:42:16 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-04 00:13:23 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-04-04 05:52:42 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-07 22:41:47 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-04 07:50:39 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-04 19:51:24 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-05 01:39:33 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-04 21:54:44 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-06 02:23:46 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-07 22:39:38 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-08 08:47:27 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-08 20:39:22 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-09 07:51:19 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-09 20:00:40 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-10 07:36:17 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-10 08:53:22 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-09 07:53:32 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-09 19:54:10 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-07 08:07:32 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"tlmfru" <la  2008-04-05 10:54:00 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-05 18:18:13 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"tlmfru" <la  2008-04-07 11:08:23 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-07 21:11:04 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"tlmfru" <la  2008-04-08 11:00:52 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-07 08:09:26 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"tlmfru" <la  2008-04-07 10:49:27 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-07 08:04:00 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"HeyBub" <he  2008-04-04 08:53:49 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-04 21:19:36 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-05 17:34:51 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-05 14:03:36 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-07 08:12:37 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-07 20:24:59 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 3:30:15 CDT 2008.