Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)

"Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:65572qF2devk5U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I think the whole debate over OO is pointless. The world has voted with
its
> feet. Trying to pretend there is nothing different or advantageous in
using
> OO, over standard COBOL, is like trying to pretend that a car is really
just
> a horse...

What is, and ought to be, central to the discussion is
the use of OO for core business applications, such as
accounting. IBM created the San Francisco Project,
as I understand it, as a means for VARs to implement
core business applications using Java. The project was
cancelled. It is not clear to me why it was cancelled,
but the thousands of VARs that might have benefited
from this free software apparently saw no reason to
use it.

But, hey, if you are not using OO for core business
applications, then you may not be able to appreciate
the problems. <g>