Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)

On Mar 28, 1:07=A0pm, "tlmfru" <la...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> While wanting to use different terms, to avoid confusion and baggage,
was =
a
> good idea, their choice was singularly poor. =A0So far as I can tell
EVERY=

> OO-oriented term carries unwanted meanings - e.g., my tiff last year
with =
PD
> over "function".
>
> Having said this, I'm fully aware that nobody will ever be able to
prevent=

> newcomers to a field from trying to equate the new concepts to things
> they're familar with.
>
> So let's rename all object-oriented things as either completely new,
> artificial words - fomas and granfalloons, for instance, for objects and
> methods <wink> - or auto-oriented things. =A0Then at least there will be
n=
o
> overlap.
>
> PL
>


http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.lang.cobol/browse_thread/thread/f8a2d=
c2eb7689d9d/f3c4430fa6dad4ec?lnk