Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Cobol > Re: Cobol 85 St...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 15 Topic 4061 of 4195
Post > Topic >>

Re: Cobol 85 Standard

by "William M. Klein" <wmklein@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 20, 2008 at 04:43 AM

That is a VERY sore point in my life.  There was a lot of discussion about
this 
in the past.  I can't give legal advice (and certainly not here) but you
COULD 
ask INCITS, but my best guess is that they would just tell you that as it
is not 
a current standard, they won't answer.

-- 
Bill Klein
 wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
"tim" <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:13u3d702beqth38@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:11:27 +0000, William M. Klein wrote:
>
>> Tim,
>>   Actually, for the '85 Standard (not the '02 Standard), I think that
the
>> "Acknowledgement" does allow you to share copies.  I have a PDF that I
was
>> thinking of posting but am not certain my webspace has enough room.
>>
>
> The do***ent contradicts itself on this point. On one page it says it
may
> be freely copied in part or in full:
>
> "ACKNOWLEDGMENT
>
> Any organization interested in reproducing the COBOL standard and
> specifications in whole or in part, using ideas from this docu- ment as
> the basis for an instruction manual OI for any other purpose, is free to
> do so. However, all such organizations are requested to reproduce the
> following acknowledgment paragraphs in their entirety as part of the
> preface to any such publication (any organiza- tion using a short
> passagefrom this do***ent, such as in a book review, is requested to
> mention "COBOL" in acknowledgment of the source, but need not quote the
> acknowledgment):
>
> COBOL is an industry language and is not the property of any company OI
> group of companies, or of any organization or group of organizations. No
> warranty, expressed or implied, is made by any contributor or by the
> CODASYL COBOL Committee as to the accuracy and functioning of
> the programming system and language. Moreover, no responsibility is
assumed
> by any contributor, or by the committee, in connection therewith. The
> authors and copyright holders of the copyrighted materials used herein
> FLOW-MATIC (trademark of Sperry Rand Cor****ation), Programming for the
> UNIVAC (R) I and II, Data Automation Systems copyrighted 1958,1959, by
> Sperry Rand Cor****ation; IBM Commercial Translater Form No F 28-8013,
> copy-righted 1959 by IBM; FACT, DSI 27A5260-2760, copyrighted 1960 by
> Minneapolis-Honeywell have specifically authorized the use of this
material
> in whole or in part, in the COBOL specifications. Such authorization ex-
> tends to the reproduction and use of COBOL specifications in programming
> manuals or similar publications."
>
> The next page has the usual copyright notice. Given the draconian
penalties
> for copyright violations I am tending to err on the safe side.
>
> "Copyright ©1985 by Information Technology Industry Council (ITI)
> All rights reserved.
> No part of this publication may be reproduced in any
> form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise,
> without prior written permission of ITI, 1250 Eye Street NW,
> Wa****ngton, DC 20005."
>
> Is there any way to get some official clarification of this point?
>
> Tim
 




 15 Posts in Topic:
Cobol 85 Standard
Obnoxious User <OU@[EM  2008-03-18 19:08:10 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-18 22:35:14 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
Obnoxious User <OU@[EM  2008-03-19 16:18:46 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-19 21:36:19 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-19 23:11:27 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-20 00:50:40 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-20 04:43:28 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-20 12:17:19 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-21 00:10:51 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
"Douglas Gallant&quo  2008-03-20 22:48:17 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
John Reagan <john.reag  2008-03-25 16:00:04 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-20 06:13:24 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
Obnoxious User <OU@[EM  2008-03-20 18:00:42 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
Arnold Trembley <arnol  2008-03-21 06:11:44 
Re: Cobol 85 Standard
Obnoxious User <OU@[EM  2008-03-21 09:02:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 23:02:52 CDT 2008.