Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Cobol > Re: RW on Worki...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 81 of 252 Topic 4045 of 4195
Post > Topic >>

Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"

by Robert <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 14, 2008 at 07:52 PM

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:38:35 -0700 (PDT), Richard <riplin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On Mar 14, 6:37 pm, Robert <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>> >If my program, loaded and running, CALLs a subroutine for the first
>> >then it will create a new working-storage for that. When I CANCEL it
>> >will destroy that area and make it available for reuse by another.
>>
>> If you're talking about dynamic load, the first call is program load
time. The first call
>> after cancel is another load.
>>
>> >This could happen even if the program was linked so that the program
>> >code loaded with the run unit.
>>
>> No it doesn't. We went over this a month ago, when we discussed
ELF-style linking (loaded
>> with the run unit) of Fujitsu programs. In that case, CANCEL did
nothing, in violation of
>> the standard. The CANCELled program was NOT reinitialized. Now you are
claiming it is.
>
>No, I am claiming that it _could_, just as my words _actually_ say.

It could, and it should to be compliant with the standard. I first assumed
it did. I was
saddened when evidence showed it did not.

>If the dll or .so is linked so that it loads at the same time as the
>run-unit then the W-S area for the programs that are in the dll or .so
>don't need to be created until the program is first CALLed. This is
>because the W-S is part of the run-unit but the code is part of
>the .so.

Theoretically true. In practice, W-S is described at compile time and
allocated at program
load time. 

People mistakenly say W-S is allocated at compile time. That's impossible
because the
program might be executed on another machine or years after compilation.

>That is, the initialisation is only required at the time when the
>program in the library is CALLed for the first time. It is at this
>point that the W-S is allocated and initialised. There may be several
>or dozens of programs in a dll or .so, only a few of them actually
>being called in a particular run. As the .so is _shared_ with other
>run-units the W-S for those programs cannot be within the .so, they
>are created as required in the run-unit itself.

Do you know how Unix and Windows do it? Is W-S allocated (per process) and
initialized
when the process starts, or at the time of the first call? I honestly
don't know. My guess
is that it's done at load time. It wouldn't be hard to find out.
 




 252 Posts in Topic:
J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-09 20:16:39 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-10 17:07:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-10 21:02:37 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-12 00:38:37 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-11 08:28:36 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-12 11:48:14 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-10 07:16:52 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-11 00:47:46 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-10 09:27:08 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-10 12:35:25 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-10 20:47:40 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-11 13:54:39 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-11 08:09:21 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-10 09:20:46 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-10 11:48:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-10 11:36:29 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Frank Swarbrick&quo  2008-03-10 17:12:04 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-10 20:42:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-11 17:50:02 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-03-11 13:22:28 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-11 12:28:40 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-12 17:18:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:27:25 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-11 20:27:45 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-12 17:01:25 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-11 23:57:48 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-12 18:27:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-12 07:30:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-12 07:16:14 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 02:12:39 
RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Fut
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-12 13:21:03 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-12 20:34:49 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-13 06:28:30 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 08:14:45 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-12 18:38:59 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 13:35:44 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-12 22:52:07 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-14 01:54:46 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 23:37:13 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-14 22:22:45 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 19:52:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-15 17:39:08 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 02:13:37 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-15 15:21:10 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 22:29:11 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-16 14:34:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-16 12:01:28 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-16 13:59:44 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-17 11:39:05 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-16 22:44:23 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 11:57:35 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 22:21:01 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 18:46:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 09:00:51 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 09:01:58 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 08:57:53 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 12:08:31 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-13 20:28:10 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-14 15:38:33 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-14 19:26:22 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 20:29:27 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:53:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-16 17:29:44 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-17 14:09:28 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-12 09:01:35 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2008-03-12 11:10:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 22:40:09 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 19:52:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:31:45 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 21:12:11 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-19 11:44:13 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-20 14:12:20 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-20 12:08:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-20 06:09:53 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-21 00:21:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-17 23:51:41 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 09:14:07 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-18 20:32:26 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-19 01:14:16 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 23:38:35 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 19:52:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-14 20:20:17 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-14 20:17:26 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-15 17:43:25 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-15 04:44:57 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:51:02 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-11 17:44:36 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-11 12:29:53 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-11 20:38:59 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-12 07:16:14 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-14 20:12:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 20:46:07 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-16 16:29:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-16 21:31:33 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-17 09:20:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 07:28:05 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-17 14:18:33 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 19:30:19 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-18 09:19:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 08:15:40 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-18 13:26:02 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 12:27:00 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-18 17:33:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 09:02:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 12:31:10 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 11:59:32 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-18 22:54:47 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-19 20:06:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-19 20:09:08 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-18 22:46:27 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-19 20:10:22 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 08:58:25 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 12:35:52 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 12:01:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 08:19:08 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 11:36:51 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 19:30:19 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 11:33:00 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 21:53:23 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 18:10:36 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 08:04:33 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 09:15:28 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 12:45:18 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 12:26:38 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-19 12:44:35 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 21:29:21 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-20 00:25:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-19 19:51:32 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-19 08:24:47 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 09:09:44 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 19:34:51 
Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/discu
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-31 21:55:10 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 22:37:12 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-04-01 12:44:49 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 23:09:26 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-04-01 15:43:29 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"tlmfru" <la  2008-04-01 14:05:50 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-04-02 02:45:10 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-04-02 15:31:38 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Jeff Campbell <n8wxs@[  2008-04-03 06:20:13 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
John Reagan <john.reag  2008-04-03 11:20:29 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Jeff Campbell <n8wxs@[  2008-04-03 15:29:43 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-04-03 20:15:01 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-03 23:08:04 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Jeff Campbell <n8wxs@[  2008-04-04 10:57:12 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-02 18:51:00 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-04-02 16:42:29 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-04-02 21:28:41 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-03 09:09:21 
Packed decimal versus binary was Re: J4 - presentation/discussio
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-31 22:03:45 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 08:17:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-16 14:15:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-18 12:37:04 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-19 00:09:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-19 11:02:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-12 11:30:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-12 13:12:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-12 19:44:20 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-13 01:22:47 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-16 04:29:29 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 08:24:23 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-16 11:58:28 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-16 20:38:27 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 08:34:06 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 11:46:09 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 09:17:54 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 08:30:31 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-12 12:18:04 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-12 12:45:11 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-12 14:16:59 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 13:24:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-12 23:04:17 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-13 09:25:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-14 00:19:12 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 00:13:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 23:37:13 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 11:11:08 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 23:37:14 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-14 14:29:05 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 18:38:13 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-15 04:25:14 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 01:19:11 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-15 12:50:36 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:44:16 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 12:41:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 23:37:14 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-14 12:44:05 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 20:16:27 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-15 04:40:32 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-15 16:54:24 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-16 13:59:43 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:35:10 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-16 21:42:49 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 07:47:52 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-18 12:32:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-18 21:17:52 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 13:13:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 23:37:14 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-17 17:54:40 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-17 20:09:47 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 22:53:26 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 09:12:16 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 12:41:16 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 12:08:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-13 14:03:45 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-14 12:00:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 23:37:14 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 23:03:07 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-14 12:06:21 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-14 12:11:18 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"HeyBub" <he  2008-03-14 14:37:47 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:39:57 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 21:55:24 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-16 17:31:33 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-16 14:28:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-15 13:30:37 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-15 13:40:12 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 22:19:48 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-11 02:08:27 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-11 08:16:22 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-11 19:08:11 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
billg999@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-11 19:31:57 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-11 14:07:13 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-12 11:49:39 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 01:48:57 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-12 09:04:44 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 13:16:19 
Ease of developing systems and cell phones was Re: J4 - presenta
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-12 22:55:37 
Re: Ease of developing systems and cell phones was Re: J4 - pres
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 15:58:34 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-12 16:07:35 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 13:17:44 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
billg999@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-12 14:47:55 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 12:43:13 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Frank Swarbrick&quo  2008-03-12 13:36:38 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-12 20:06:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-15 01:22:11 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-15 21:06:12 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-16 15:49:46 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-15 01:24:05 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 20:42:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-14 21:39:33 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:24:55 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Waldek Hebisch <hebisc  2008-03-16 18:41:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-16 04:17:38 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-16 17:39:54 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-16 22:17:12 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Waldek Hebisch <hebisc  2008-03-19 15:01:18 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-19 09:25:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-19 19:51:09 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-19 21:39:24 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-20 00:34:06 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-19 22:01:18 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 16:29:16 CDT 2008.