Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Cobol > Re: RW on Worki...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 33 of 252 Topic 4045 of 4196
Post > Topic >>

Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"

by "William M. Klein" <wmklein@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 13, 2008 at 06:28 AM

I can certainly understand the confussion but calling something "static
data" 
(and defining what that means does NOT mean that the storage is allocated 
statically (which was your statement).  The section that you quoted from
is 
under

  "8.6.3 Automatic, initial, and static internal items"

The first paragraph explains what all of this is about, i.e.

"Each internal item has one of the three persistence attributes:
automatic, 
initial, or static. The designation of automatic, initial, and static
items 
relates to their persistence and the persistence of their contents during
the 
execution of the run unit."

Notice inparticular that for "automatic" data, it says,
  "Their storage is allocated and set to initial state each time the
runtime 
element containing them is activated."

For "static" items, the statement is quite different.  It says,

"They are allocated no later than immediately before initialization"

Which I think (to me) is NOT what you said, i.e.

" The standard says working-storage is allocated statically."


-- 
Bill Klein
 wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
"Robert" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:lr3ht3pi8lejvamj0qjgpfdbdqo88336s6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:21:03 GMT, "William M. Klein" 
> <wmklein@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>> "Robert" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:38kft3t3h52mm32b1vekgqe1qu98l7l1la@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:01:25 +1300, "Pete Dashwood"
>>>> <dashwood@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>><snip>
>>> The standard says working-storage is allocated
>>> statically.
>>>
>>
>>Robert,
>>   Can you point me to where in "the Standard" ('85 or '02) that it says
this?
>>(Certainly it is NOT true in the '02 Standard where you specifically can
use 
>>the
>>ALLOCATE/FREE statements to dynamically get storage in Working-Storage 
>>Section.)
>>To the best of my knowledge, no previous ANSI/ISO Standard ever said
this
>>either.  In fact, as I recall, when, where, and how storage was
allocated by
>>some vendors differed, for example, for 01-levels and 77-levels.
>
> 8.6.3 of the 2002 standard
>
> Data items and file connectors defined in the working-storage,
communication, 
> or file
> section of a source element that is not an initial program are static
items. 
> Also, screen
> item attributes in a source element that is not an initial program are
treated 
> as static
> items. These items are set to their initial state each time the runtime 
> element or object
> containing them is set to its initial state, as described in
14.5.2.1.2.1, 
> Initial state,
> and in 14.5.2.2, Initial state of object data. They are allocated no
later 
> than
> immediately before initialization and persist to the first of the
> following:
> - the end of the run unit,
>
> A based entry is a data description entry in the working-storage
section, 
> local-storage
> section, or linkage section that is described with a BASED clause. A
based 
> entry is not
> initially associated with an actual data item. An association is
established 
> linking the
> based entry to actual data when its implicit data-address pointer is
assigned 
> the address
> of an existing data item or assigned the address of storage obtained
with an 
> ALLOCATE
> statement. This association establishes a based data item.
 




 252 Posts in Topic:
J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-09 20:16:39 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-10 17:07:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-10 21:02:37 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-12 00:38:37 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-11 08:28:36 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-12 11:48:14 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-10 07:16:52 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-11 00:47:46 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-10 09:27:08 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-10 12:35:25 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-10 20:47:40 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-11 13:54:39 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-11 08:09:21 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-10 09:20:46 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-10 11:48:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-10 11:36:29 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Frank Swarbrick&quo  2008-03-10 17:12:04 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-10 20:42:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-11 17:50:02 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-03-11 13:22:28 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-11 12:28:40 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-12 17:18:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:27:25 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-11 20:27:45 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-12 17:01:25 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-11 23:57:48 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-12 18:27:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-12 07:30:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-12 07:16:14 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 02:12:39 
RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Fut
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-12 13:21:03 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-12 20:34:49 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-13 06:28:30 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 08:14:45 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-12 18:38:59 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 13:35:44 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-12 22:52:07 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-14 01:54:46 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 23:37:13 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-14 22:22:45 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 19:52:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-15 17:39:08 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 02:13:37 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-15 15:21:10 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 22:29:11 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-16 14:34:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-16 12:01:28 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-16 13:59:44 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-17 11:39:05 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-16 22:44:23 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 11:57:35 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 22:21:01 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 18:46:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 09:00:51 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 09:01:58 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 08:57:53 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 12:08:31 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-13 20:28:10 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-14 15:38:33 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-14 19:26:22 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 20:29:27 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:53:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-16 17:29:44 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-17 14:09:28 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-12 09:01:35 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2008-03-12 11:10:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 22:40:09 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 19:52:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:31:45 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 21:12:11 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-19 11:44:13 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-20 14:12:20 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-20 12:08:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-20 06:09:53 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-21 00:21:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-17 23:51:41 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 09:14:07 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-18 20:32:26 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-19 01:14:16 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 23:38:35 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 19:52:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-14 20:20:17 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-14 20:17:26 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-15 17:43:25 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-15 04:44:57 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:51:02 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-11 17:44:36 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-11 12:29:53 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-11 20:38:59 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-12 07:16:14 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-14 20:12:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 20:46:07 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-16 16:29:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-16 21:31:33 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-17 09:20:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 07:28:05 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-17 14:18:33 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 19:30:19 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-18 09:19:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 08:15:40 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-18 13:26:02 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 12:27:00 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-18 17:33:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 09:02:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 12:31:10 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 11:59:32 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-18 22:54:47 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-19 20:06:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-19 20:09:08 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-18 22:46:27 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-19 20:10:22 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 08:58:25 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 12:35:52 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 12:01:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 08:19:08 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 11:36:51 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 19:30:19 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 11:33:00 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 21:53:23 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 18:10:36 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 08:04:33 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 09:15:28 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 12:45:18 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 12:26:38 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-19 12:44:35 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 21:29:21 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-20 00:25:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-19 19:51:32 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-19 08:24:47 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 09:09:44 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 19:34:51 
Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/discu
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-31 21:55:10 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 22:37:12 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-04-01 12:44:49 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 23:09:26 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-04-01 15:43:29 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"tlmfru" <la  2008-04-01 14:05:50 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-04-02 02:45:10 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-04-02 15:31:38 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Jeff Campbell <n8wxs@[  2008-04-03 06:20:13 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
John Reagan <john.reag  2008-04-03 11:20:29 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Jeff Campbell <n8wxs@[  2008-04-03 15:29:43 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-04-03 20:15:01 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-03 23:08:04 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Jeff Campbell <n8wxs@[  2008-04-04 10:57:12 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-02 18:51:00 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-04-02 16:42:29 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-04-02 21:28:41 
Re: Decimal versus binary arithmetic was Re: J4 - presentation/d
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-03 09:09:21 
Packed decimal versus binary was Re: J4 - presentation/discussio
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-31 22:03:45 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 08:17:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-16 14:15:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-18 12:37:04 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-19 00:09:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-19 11:02:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-12 11:30:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-12 13:12:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-12 19:44:20 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-13 01:22:47 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-16 04:29:29 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 08:24:23 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-16 11:58:28 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-16 20:38:27 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 08:34:06 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-18 11:46:09 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 09:17:54 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-17 08:30:31 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-12 12:18:04 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-12 12:45:11 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-12 14:16:59 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 13:24:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-12 23:04:17 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-13 09:25:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-14 00:19:12 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 00:13:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 23:37:13 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 11:11:08 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 23:37:14 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-14 14:29:05 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 18:38:13 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-15 04:25:14 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 01:19:11 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-15 12:50:36 
Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:44:16 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 12:41:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 23:37:14 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-14 12:44:05 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 20:16:27 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-15 04:40:32 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-15 16:54:24 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-16 13:59:43 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:35:10 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-16 21:42:49 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 07:47:52 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-18 12:32:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-18 21:17:52 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 13:13:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 23:37:14 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-17 17:54:40 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-17 20:09:47 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-17 22:53:26 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 09:12:16 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-18 12:41:16 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-18 12:08:03 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-13 14:03:45 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-14 12:00:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 23:37:14 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-13 23:03:07 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-14 12:06:21 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-14 12:11:18 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"HeyBub" <he  2008-03-14 14:37:47 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:39:57 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 21:55:24 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-16 17:31:33 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-16 14:28:42 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-15 13:30:37 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-15 13:40:12 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-15 22:19:48 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-11 02:08:27 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-11 08:16:22 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-11 19:08:11 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
billg999@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-11 19:31:57 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-11 14:07:13 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-12 11:49:39 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 01:48:57 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-12 09:04:44 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 13:16:19 
Ease of developing systems and cell phones was Re: J4 - presenta
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-12 22:55:37 
Re: Ease of developing systems and cell phones was Re: J4 - pres
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 15:58:34 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-12 16:07:35 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 13:17:44 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
billg999@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-12 14:47:55 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-13 12:43:13 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Frank Swarbrick&quo  2008-03-12 13:36:38 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-12 20:06:50 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-15 01:22:11 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-03-15 21:06:12 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-16 15:49:46 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-15 01:24:05 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 20:42:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-14 21:39:33 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-15 13:24:55 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Waldek Hebisch <hebisc  2008-03-16 18:41:30 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-16 04:17:38 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-16 17:39:54 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-16 22:17:12 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Waldek Hebisch <hebisc  2008-03-19 15:01:18 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-19 09:25:56 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-19 19:51:09 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-19 21:39:24 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-20 00:34:06 
Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standar
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-19 22:01:18 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 3:29:35 CDT 2008.