Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Cobol > Re: Today (Feb ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 35 Topic 4026 of 4195
Post > Topic >>

Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements

by Robert <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 28, 2008 at 12:33 PM

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:42:42 -0600, "Judson McClendon"
<judmc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>"Robert" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> According to US labor law, programmers and systems analysts (not all IT
workers) earning
>> more then $27.63 per hour ($56K/yr) are NOT entitled to overtime pay.
(first link) The
>> 7,600 people who were reclassified and received a 15% cut as a result
of Rosenburg v. IBM
>> nearly all made more than the cutoff (third link below). They were not
programmers. IBM
>> claimed they were "professionals". The test for professional is:
>>
>> Work Requiring Advanced Knowledge
>> "Work requiring advanced knowledge" means work which is predominantly
intellectual in
>> character, and which includes work requiring the consistent exercise of
discretion and
>> judgment. Professional work is therefore distinguished from work
involving routine mental,
>> manual, mechanical or physical work. A professional employee generally
uses the advanced
>> knowledge to analyze, interpret or make deductions from varying facts
or cir***stances.
>> Advanced knowledge cannot be attained at the high school level."
(second link below)
>>
>> Does production sup****t qualify as professional? Apparently the court
said no. The 7,600
>> reclassified were only 6% of IBM's work force.
>>
>> http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/whd/fairpay/fs17e_computer.htm
>>
http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/whd/fairpay/fs17d_professional.htm
>> http://www.allianceibm.org/salarycomments.php
   search for "survey"
>
>Those laws do not *forbid* such people from receiving overtime pay,
>as your language above implies. The purpose of those laws is to require
>overtime pay for those who *do not* meet those criteria, not to forbid it
>for those who do. An employer may chose to pay overtime to anyone
>who works for them.

Contracting companies routinely pay for billable hours; straight time for
overtime. 

My POINT is, programmers making more than $56K cannot sue for overtime.
Sup****t people,
like the IBMers, MIGHT be successful.
 




 35 Posts in Topic:
Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-02-26 21:24:10 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-02-27 19:35:28 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-28 14:51:24 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-27 22:49:40 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-02-28 07:42:42 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-28 12:33:46 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 12:10:38 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-29 09:48:05 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 14:33:13 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-28 22:13:55 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-29 13:07:12 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-29 01:56:52 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-29 08:46:29 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-28 22:05:48 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-28 18:34:31 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-29 08:48:37 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-29 20:47:49 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-01 08:20:18 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-01 12:59:50 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-01 23:44:39 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-02 10:14:21 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-02 23:37:47 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-03 10:12:27 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-03 10:09:50 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-28 10:19:48 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 08:15:31 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-29 10:21:17 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-28 18:40:47 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-29 14:00:49 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-02-28 06:10:28 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-02-28 13:22:25 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-02-28 11:29:41 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-28 19:40:42 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 12:57:31 
Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-28 23:13:25 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 16:17:09 CDT 2008.