"Michael Mattias" <mmattias@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> It has always puzzled me why so many (particularly COBOL) people
hesitate to make the leap to a different language, when
>> "programming ability" is an underlying skill, that really shouldn't be
language dependent...
>
> You are assuming the presence of fundamental programming skills.
>
> However, many of the modern development tools/environments allow
"developers" to create applications without ever learning those
> fundamentals. A few clicks, a few drags, a few drops and presto! you can
call yourself a programmer.
>
> With no such tools available, people of our generation HAD to learn the
fundamentals, so for us changing languages or development
> environments is pretty straightforward... except when we find ourselves
in one of these newfangled IDEs where fundamentals don't
> matter.
You're right. And when these new "programmers" face a situation that
requires actual programming skills, they're lost. I think a demarcation
between the two different skills would be useful. Perhaps something
like "application assembler" rather than "programmer" would be a
better description for such people. It always gets me when people
who can only write HTML (for example) claim to be "programmers."
It's like a typist claiming to be an "author."
I've mentioned this here before, but a cousin of mine who is the same
age as me, and has a MS in CS, and has taught CS at university level,
has a daughter who just finished her BS in CS. He made sure she did
learn good programming skills, but said he was dismayed that the
university CS department put so little emphasis on it.
--
Judson McClendon judmc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove zero)
Sun Valley Systems http://sunvaley.com
"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that
whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
|
