<docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> William M. Klein <wmklein@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>"terminology" is always a clue to emotional intent.
>>
>> Pro-Life vs Anti-Abortion
>> Pro-Choice vs Pro-Abortion
>
> Hmmmmmm... I wonder what kind of intent might be garnered from a
proposing
> of terms like 'pre-natal', 'para-natal' and 'post-natal'?
>
> Some utterly fiendish agenda, assuredly... not even worth responding to,
> some might say... or not-say.
Or one might chose to look beyond the surface and see that the issue
is to what purpose the is taxonomy applied. Then, realizing it is used
for the purpose of deceiving people into committing the most heinous
of crimes and claiming innocence because of the particular taxonomy
rather than looking at the reality, see past the trivialities of taxonomy
to the truth of the deceit. Of course, to do that, one must be interested
in more than trivial arguments used to deceive and distract from the
real issues involved. Murder of innocent unborn babies is murder of
innocent unborn babies, no matter what taxonomy one chooses to use
to mask the fact. Therefore, anyone arguing otherwise has already cast
aside any pretense of morality, or reason. An obvious corollary is that
there is no point arguing with people who advocate and defend mass
murder of the most innocent and helpless for the sake of convenience.
--
Judson McClendon judmc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove zero)
Sun Valley Systems http://sunvaley.com
"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that
whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
|
