Re: OT: The Geek defense

"Robert" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:ptd9s3pillg13bs10q5mao9fmg66redgu7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:36:44 +1300, "Pete Dashwood" 
> <dashwood@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>"tim" <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:13s728si8g08id9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> His attorney's tactics smack of desperation I think. But I have no
idea
>>> whether he did it.
>>
>>Yes, I agree. I also have no idea whether he did it and would not make
any
>>kind of judgement until I had reviewed the evidence.
>
> It's all circumstantial. There is no dead body. The only tangible
evidence 
> is a satchel
> with her blood on it found in his car. Police cannot tell how old the 
> blood is. It could
> date back to when they were together.
>
> The prosecution thinks it's significant that he removed the passenger
seat 
> from his Honda
> CRX Si. That car is a two seat s****ts car with very little cargo space.
He 
> probably
> removed the seat in order to carry groceries.
>
>>Nevertheless, it is an "interesting" defense...
>
> Geeks are incapable of murder?
>
> This quiz tests whether you can distinguish a programmer from a killer
by 
> appearance. It's
> easy, but I'll bet you miss at least two.
> http://www.malevole.com/mv/misc/killerquiz/

You win your bet. I did miss two, but it was a fun quiz... thanks.

Pete.
-- 
"I used to write COBOL...now I can do anything."