Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Cobol > Re: OT: The Gee...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 10 of 146 Topic 4019 of 4196
Post > Topic >>

Re: OT: The Geek defense

by SkippyPB <swiegand@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 27, 2008 at 12:33 PM

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:36:44 +1300, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashwood@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>
>"tim" <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:13s728si8g08id9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:46:19 +1300, Pete Dashwood wrote:
>>
>>>
http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/23/AR2008022300693_pf.html
>>>
>>> What I'd like to know is exactly HOW you can establish yourself as a 
>>> Geek,
>>> so you can claim this defence. If writing a file system for Linux is
all 
>>> it
>>> takes (a weekend's work for a COBOL programmer...), then there are a
lot
>>> more Geeks around than many people may suppose.
>>>
>>> Did he do it?  (Jo Brand, referring to O. J. Simpson: "Course he did
it;
>>> he's a bloke...")
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Pete.
>>
>> You must be pretty good if you can write 15,000 lines of
>> multi-processing kernel code in a weekend.
>
>Well, leaving aside the fact that I AM pretty good :-), it was said with 
>tongue-in-cheek...:-)
>
>As a matter of record, I once wrote a complete access method for a
mainframe 
>in a Bank, over a weekend. Another dedicated guy and myself worked on 
>implementing it into about 300 programs over the same weekend. It enabled

>direct access based on Account numbers and had its own ha****ng algorithm 
>based around the structure of account numbers in that particular Bank. It

>was a complete callable subsystem that implemented all the functions of
data 
>maintenance using VSAM RRDS. On Monday, everythng was working when the
staff 
>showed up. We had a total of 9 hours sleep each and were given the rest
of 
>the week off... :-) It was a long time ago; I wouldn't/couldn't do it now

>:-)
>

So you're the guy that did that!!  First job I had out of college was
working in an all IBM Assembler shop.  They had about 20 different
applications consisting of around 300 programs or so.  One of the
first changes they wanted was to convert their file access system from
DA to ISAM (which was the soup de jour of the day).  The reason was
noone, and I mean noone myslef included, could figure out how the damn
thing worked!  It did work but neither I, the resident Assembler
programmer or the account's IBM system engineer (back in the days when
these guys could write code with the best of them) could figure out
how it worked.  The person that wrote it and moved on to another job
in another state and wasn't available for questions.  This wasn't a
bank, but I'm going to blame you for my many nights of writing code to
change the file access.  :)


>This is the size of the ext3
>> file system which is the predominant file system used in Linux.
>>
>
>Like I said, my comment was not meant seriously...
>
>> His attorney's tactics smack of desperation I think. But I have no idea
>> whether he did it.
>
>Yes, I agree. I also have no idea whether he did it and would not make
any 
>kind of judgement until I had reviewed the evidence.
>
>Nevertheless, it is an "interesting" defence...
>
>Pete.

Regards,
          ////
         (o o)
-oOO--(_)--OOo-

"Marry me and I'll never look at another horse!."
--  Groucho Marx
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Remove nospam to email me.

Steve
 




 146 Posts in Topic:
OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-26 10:46:19 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-25 21:32:14 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-26 03:35:56 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-02-26 09:37:53 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2008-02-26 11:30:06 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-27 09:36:44 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-26 19:27:37 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-28 11:16:18 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 08:13:07 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2008-02-27 12:33:17 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-28 11:21:13 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2008-02-28 11:34:24 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-29 12:01:58 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Charles Hottel"  2008-02-28 19:24:14 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2008-02-29 10:56:00 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-02 06:24:10 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-02-27 12:24:28 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-28 11:52:14 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-02-27 12:31:39 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-02-27 12:35:59 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-02-28 12:04:38 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-02-29 14:35:11 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-29 22:45:32 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-29 20:05:29 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-29 19:49:38 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-01 17:25:02 
Re: The Geek defense
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-02-26 08:00:53 
Re: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-26 10:22:12 
Re: The Geek defense
"HeyBub" <he  2008-02-26 13:54:59 
Re: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-27 09:14:09 
Re: The Geek defense
"HeyBub" <he  2008-02-26 16:08:13 
Re: The Geek defense
"Charles Hottel"  2008-02-26 18:38:05 
Re: The Geek defense
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-02-27 12:19:04 
Re: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-27 07:30:51 
Re: The Geek defense
Arnold Trembley <arnol  2008-02-27 06:49:01 
Re: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-28 12:10:20 
Re: The Geek defense
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-28 01:25:41 
Re: The Geek defense
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-02-27 12:21:21 
Re: The Geek defense
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-02-27 22:20:49 
Re: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-29 12:05:47 
Re: The Geek defense
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-02-29 06:54:06 
Re: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-01 19:14:51 
Re: The Geek defense
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-03-01 14:32:52 
Re: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-01 12:59:50 
Re: The Geek defense
"HeyBub" <he  2008-03-01 21:31:07 
Re: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-02 10:07:00 
Re: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-03 10:06:44 
Re: The Geek defense
"HeyBub" <he  2008-03-03 18:38:45 
Re: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-03 21:06:30 
Re: The Geek defense
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-04 10:16:26 
Re: The Geek defense
"HeyBub" <he  2008-03-04 07:49:19 
Re: The Geek defense
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-04 16:04:32 
Re: The Geek defense
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-03-02 08:17:19 
Re: The Geek defense
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-03-02 09:57:48 
Re: The Geek defense
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-02-28 12:05:25 
Re: The Geek defense
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-02-29 14:37:34 
Re: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-29 20:22:14 
Re: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-01 19:25:20 
Re: The Geek defense
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-03-01 07:25:20 
Re: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-01 23:55:43 
Re: The Geek defense
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-03-01 14:32:52 
Re: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-01 12:59:49 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-26 21:23:19 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-28 11:43:17 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-02-27 21:08:37 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-28 15:26:12 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-02-28 13:19:18 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-02-28 07:36:14 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 08:10:55 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 08:10:01 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 08:06:17 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-29 11:23:47 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-27 21:26:41 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-28 11:10:59 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-28 20:02:24 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
billg999@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-28 15:26:24 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-29 10:47:20 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-02-28 16:45:06 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-29 13:48:52 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-02-28 22:58:17 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-29 17:11:33 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-29 08:36:54 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-01 19:08:04 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-01 10:57:00 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-02 09:09:29 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-01 17:31:25 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-01 22:17:59 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-02 18:41:40 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-02 08:27:34 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-03 12:59:09 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-03 08:20:49 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-01 17:29:58 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-28 19:16:00 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-29 08:34:14 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
billg999@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-28 15:30:17 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-28 19:19:34 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-29 11:27:06 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-28 19:35:40 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 12:53:18 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-02-29 11:55:25 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-28 23:04:39 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-29 06:12:00 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-29 08:07:22 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-02-29 16:28:24 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-29 19:34:15 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-01 18:58:45 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-01 12:59:49 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-01 17:22:05 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-01 17:20:22 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
billg999@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-29 12:47:41 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-29 08:40:56 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-29 19:56:59 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-02-29 15:39:13 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-01 17:16:18 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2008-03-02 11:23:45 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-01 12:59:49 
Re: The Geek defense
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-01 22:01:03 
Re: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-01 17:36:49 
Re: The Geek defense
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-02 01:45:15 
Re: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-03 08:36:52 
Re: The Geek defense
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-03 16:00:47 
Re: The Geek defense
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-03-02 08:28:48 
Re: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-03 08:49:11 
Re: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-02 00:20:06 
Re: The Geek defense
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2008-03-02 11:31:32 
Re: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-02 14:47:28 
Re: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-03 13:07:01 
Re: The Geek defense
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2008-03-03 10:39:57 
Re: The Geek defense
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-03-02 08:26:32 
Re: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-03 08:51:09 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-01 22:12:22 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-01 23:48:36 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-03-02 08:09:39 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-02 23:13:55 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-03-02 19:04:09 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-03 12:34:57 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-03-02 19:08:14 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-03 23:37:34 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-02 18:55:40 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-03 23:40:06 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-03 08:16:22 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-03 12:45:19 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-03 17:46:27 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-04 10:49:18 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-03 15:03:08 
Re: OT: The Geek defense
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-03 08:08:59 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 3:18:24 CDT 2008.