On 26 Feb, 18:07, "Judson McClendon" <ju...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "William M. Klein" <wmkl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I must have missed the note that moved from "global warming" to
"population control" so I don't know how "abortion" got into the
> > thread.
>
> As for why the original comments were made about population growth in
> the first place, you will need to ask the OP.
>
> But abortion came up very simply. A comment was made that people in
> certain western countries including the U.S. were not reproducing enough
> to make strong population increase a problem, and I listed over 50
million
> abortions in the U.S. within 40 years as a factor.
> --
50 million abortions does not equal 50 million cases of reproduction
denied. Many foetuses would spontaneously abort whether or not man
gets in the way.
Where do you get your 50 million figure from? It had better not be one
million a year for 50 years as that would be all too easy to refute.
