Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Cobol > Re: Poplulation...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 14 Topic 4022 of 4115
Post > Topic >>

Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Shows

by Alistair <alistair@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 26, 2008 at 11:39 AM

On 26 Feb, 15:49, "Judson McClendon" <ju...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "William M. Klein" <wmkl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Judson McClendon" <ju...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "Clark F Morris" <cfmpub...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>> As a US citizen living in Canada, I note that major portions of
> >>> Europe, the US and Canada are not having enough children to keep the
> >>> population steady. =A0A good social security and pension system
seems =
to
> >>> work wonders in keeping populations down. =A0Urbanization also helps
> >>> since children no longer are of as much economic benefit. =A0Again a
> >>> pension system gives people the feeling they don't need to have
> >>> children to take care of them in their old age. =A0In short, you
don't=

> >>> need to be a drastic as China to curb the population.
>
> >> Don't know about the other countries you mentioned, but since Roe Vs.
> >> Wade, the United States alone has killed more than 50 million unborn
> >> children.
>
> > I don't know what country Judson lives in <G>, but since Roe vs Wade
the=
re have been ZERO " children" killed as a result of that
> > change. =A0There have been many pregnancies terminated, but as defined
i=
n the US today, no CHILDREN have been killed by this.
>
> Please note that I said "unborn children". Do you say that the unborn
> babies who are alive right now are not the children of their mother?
> Many of them (partial birth abortions) were killed seconds before full
> birth. By what twisted perverted logic does one say that a baby that is
> being born, and all it's body is outside the mother's body except for
> part of the head, is not a child of the mother? Obviously, the twisted
> and perverted logic that permits one to murder their own flesh and
> blood for the sake of convenience.
> --
> Judson McClendon =A0 =A0 =A0 ju...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (remove zero)
> Sun Valley Systems =A0 =A0http://sunvaley.com
> "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that
> whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."-
Hid=
e quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Unborn children are not children. They might be blastocysts or even
foetuses but until born they are not children. I find it interesting
that you mention killing babies where the head is still in utero and
the body already expelled. Perhaps I can help? In the UK we would
ensure that such breach births are dealt with by caesarean operations.
Usually this works out fine for baby and mother.

So, what really is going on in the births that you mention? I presume
that you have a maximum age limit before termination is disallowed or
are you putting a pro-life/anti-abortion slant on it?




 14 Posts in Topic:
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-02-26 11:39:53 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-26 12:50:20 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-02-26 14:31:32 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-26 13:42:21 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-02-26 14:54:24 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-26 20:16:35 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-27 07:29:05 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-27 21:09:23 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-28 10:27:19 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-27 15:08:11 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-27 08:27:43 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-27 15:50:45 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2008-02-27 12:48:13 
Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Sho
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-02-27 01:01:13 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed May 14 17:13:54 CDT 2008.