David,
Actually, I have been using "cmd" instead of "command" for many years
now when running under W2K or XP. Can't remember any more why I
switched, but it probably had to do with better functionality than
"command"; and it has always worked fine before Vista.
If you google on "cmd versus command" you get some interesting
discussions on the merits of cmd.
Anyway, I will give it a try
Thx
Dick
On Mar 31, 11:16 pm, dlzc <dl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Dear tmkos...:
>
> On Mar 31, 1:45 pm, tmkos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > Hello David
>
> > The propgram that is being invoked is actually
> > included in a BAT file; the BAT file is invoked
> > with a number of parameters.
>
> From command line, from desktop, from shortcut...?
>
> > However, ths issue seems to be the invocation
> > om the "cmd" command interpreter, regardless of
> > the actual program that is being invoked.
>
> Doh! Command.com should be invoked to run a DOS program, not cmd.exe.
>
> > I have since seen that there are differences in
> > the memory layout as displayed with the MEM
> > command - but I don't have access to the VISTA
> > system at this moment, so will post that later
> > this week
>
> Good luck.
>
> David A. Smith
|
