"dlzc" <dlzc1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> je napisao u ****uci interesnoj
grupi:727948a9-f93c-4a7c-a7e9-49582c78e846@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mar 13, 6:27 am, "sali" <s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "N:dlzcD:aol T:com (dlzc)" <dl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> je napisao u ****uci
interesnoj
> grupi:AQ9Cj.47185$kp6.2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Dear sali:
>
> > "sali" <s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:frambr$md9$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> "ktos" <k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> je napisao u ****uci interesnoj
> >> grupi:fr9c0k$5t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> My first customer installed Vista (Basic) and did not
> >>> agree to run a programm (clipper 5.3b) in a window.
>
> >> is there some disadvantage to run in full-sized windowed
> >> mode [the window that covers the whole screen]?
>
> > Micro$haft "deprecates" full screen DOS console windows
> > on Vista. It is not available with any current video
> > driver,
>
> sorry for missunderstanding
>
> i was not talking about "full screen dos console", but
> about "full-sized window"
The OP says his customer will not accept a window, regardless of how
big one might make it.
sorry for missunderstanding, but i found just "not accept a window", there
is no mention about screen-sized window, just "normal" window
i have few places where customer accepted reasonably big window, filling
almost whole screen.
windowed clipper app has also an advantage that screen-saver will not drop
full-screen to taskbar and confuse user, and other tools are also more
readily available when run in [big] window than dos-full-screen
anyway, i perfectly know what are you talking about, my solution is if you
may-not-beat-it, then at-least-try-to-avoid-it!
|
