by "Geoff Schaller" <geoffx@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 12, 2008 at 11:27 AM
You've been hiding it on me <g>.
One thing I found was about 300 methods without a return statement.
Return SELF assumed. That was nothing compared to the 100's of INT to
DWORD errors! They took a while to rewrite because you needed to
understand the context where they occurred.
But this was all long ago and it resulted in code which never gives me
5333s.
Cheers,
Geoff
"D.J.W. van Kooten" <public@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:u4suv3losv74vce3c8q7a84c7vpk72on8v@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:28:45 +1000, "Craig Dawson"
> <craig@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >100% agree! Same situation here when we went to 2.8
> >Worth every minute fixing them up.
> >
> We didn't even have that much to change. We must have had better code
> than Geoff always suspects <g>
>
> Dick van Kooten
