100% agree! Same situation here when we went to 2.8
Worth every minute fixing them up.
Craig.
"Geoff Schaller" <geoffx@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:47fe921b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Only 100!
>
> We had 1000's. You are lucky.
>
> So fix them! And turn on ALL warnings as errors and fix everything. You
> code will love you for it.
>
> <g>
>
>
>
> "Tony Holland" <tony.holland@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:25ab3f37-0173-4ae9-9eb4-1d9f330b1bbb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> On Apr 9, 7:13 pm, "Geoff Schaller"
>> <geo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > Tony,
>> >
>> > It will work along the lines Steve suggested but there are more
exposed
>> > methods in 2.8 and they simply work better.
>> >
>> > Geoff
>>
>> Ok, I now have VO2.8 - loaded the .aef, build, have over 100 errors.
>> On a scale of 1 to 10 on the ****ometer, this rates up near the top.
>>
>> I know I'm years behind most of you with getting int vo2.8 - I guess
>> this is why. Is there something simple I am not doing / need to set?
>>
>> Any tips here are gratefully accepted.
>>
>> Tony
>
|
