Tony;
Look at the 100 errors as op****tunities!! The compiler is much tighter
and
warns you of potential problems. Many of the errors probably point out
typo's like an ")" instead of an "}". I certainly appreciate the errors
that the 2.8 compiler finds for me. Having said all that, I had ugraded
on
a regular basis, but the first compile still surprised me. I though I was
better than that. <Grin> Most were easy to fix.
Best regards;
Don Bjortomt
"Tony Holland" <tony.holland@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:25ab3f37-0173-4ae9-9eb4-1d9f330b1bbb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 9, 7:13 pm, "Geoff Schaller"
<geo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Tony,
>
> It will work along the lines Steve suggested but there are more exposed
> methods in 2.8 and they simply work better.
>
> Geoff
Ok, I now have VO2.8 - loaded the .aef, build, have over 100 errors.
On a scale of 1 to 10 on the ****ometer, this rates up near the top.
I know I'm years behind most of you with getting int vo2.8 - I guess
this is why. Is there something simple I am not doing / need to set?
Any tips here are gratefully accepted.
Tony
|
