On Apr 9, 7:13=A0pm, "Geoff Schaller"
<geo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Tony,
>
> It will work along the lines Steve suggested but there are more exposed
> methods in 2.8 and they simply work better.
>
> Geoff
Ok, I now have VO2.8 - loaded the .aef, build, have over 100 errors.
On a scale of 1 to 10 on the ****ometer, this rates up near the top.
I know I'm years behind most of you with getting int vo2.8 - I guess
this is why. Is there something simple I am not doing / need to set?
Any tips here are gratefully accepted.
Tony


|