Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Clarion > Re: Should I Us...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 3 Topic 9041 of 9121
Post > Topic >>

Re: Should I Use Clarion?

by "Earl R Coker" <ksasales AT machlink DOT com> Feb 14, 2008 at 12:22 AM

Clarion is by far the easiest AND fastest DATABASE development SYSTEM of 
them all.  Of course, you can always hand code it too but why when you
have 
all of those great templates going for you.  "Templates" in Clarion equate

to "code library" in other languages.  The "Clarion Way" allows the 
developer to insert "embed code" in many strategic places in the IDE's 
template generated code and then NOT lose the embed code on the IDE's next

compile process.  This feature allows for what I like to call
"incremental" 
development AND easy "adaptation" of an already developed system for use
by 
another business "niche" and/or to keep up with the ongoing new
requirements 
of a business such as is explained here 
http://www.kwiksystems.net/Benefits.htm

There is even some other "code library" type stuff we have available for 
giving a Clarion developer a "jump start" for doing what you want to do. 
It 
just so happens they are available from me/us at www.kwiksystems.com  <g>

We have 2 product types available and they both have essentially identical

functionality which are presented in 2 different formats (types) with over

four different versions (adaptations) between the two types.  The "types"
of 
products are AppShell(tm) products and DerivedShell(tm) products.  In a 
nutshell, AppShell(tm) products are a "bare bones skeleton" type of 
applications that have "only" the most basic generic, but very complete, 
common business management features already coded using only "standard" 
Clarion IDE generated "template" code (no 3rd party "add-in" template 
products) along with the necessary standard "embed" code techniques.  You 
can download a fully working demo of both types (Enterprise Edition, a 
modularized type, and OfficePLUS(tm) Edition) an all-in-one application 
non-modularized type), here 
http://www.kwiksystems.net/appshell/ApplicationShellsDownload.htm

DerivedShell(tm) products began life as AppShell(tm) products.  They
became 
DerivedShell(tm) products because they have been "fleshed out" by us using

the Clarion Integrated Development Environment (IDE) system along with a
few 
Clarion 3rd party template products (mostly available from here 
http://www.comsoft7.net/
which we also sell) along with considerable 
"standard" Clarion EMBED code to give a very useable product "as-is". 
There 
is actually a LOT of very standard "example" code used in these products
so 
they also can be used as a "learning" tool.  We have several "versions" 
(adaptations) of both types available, one of which, I/we feel you can 
probably use pretty much "as-is" in your rental business.  There are a
bunch 
of screen shots of several different versions here... 
http://www.kwiksystems.net/ApplicationScreenShots.htm
 Screen shots are
also 
in the on-line docs the link for which is below.

You can get a download of a fully working for 30 days (and then it will 
cripple) evaluation/demo of a DerivedShell(tm) product by sending us a 
private email or filling out our request for evaluation/demo download form

on this page  http://www.kwiksystems.net/EvaluationForm.htm
  You can also

view the docs for the DerivedShell(tm) OfficePLUS(tm) type on-line from
this 
link  http://www.kwiksystems.com/OnLineDocs/index.html
.   We are still 
recomending to use Windows XP as the OS for our systems although our
systems 
have been tested on MS Vista and work just fine.

If you have any questions, just ask.
-- 
Best Regards,
Earl R Coker
ksasales AT machlink DOT com
www.kwiksystems.net
www.kwiksystems.com
www.kwiksystems.net/appshell/index.htm
www.kwiksystems.com/clarion.htm (BigTamer(tm) Templates)



"L. R. Du Broff" <LRD@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:LRD-9B888F.19200113022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In a past life I was a C-language programmer, UNIX environment.
>
> I have left that behind, and purchased a small equipment rental
> business, in which I have to track a few hundred pieces of equipment in
> a few dozen locations.
>
> The previous owner used a spreadsheet for this; clearly it is (or should
> be) a database application, but "if the only tool you know how to use is
> a hammer, every problem tends to look like a nail."
>
> This will not be very large, in terms of the data being tracked.
> Multi-user access is not a requirement.
>
> Not being familiar with PC database tools, I have considered Microsoft
> Access and FileMaker -- I'm not familiar with either of them.  I was
> told that Clarion might be a good choice.  Whatever I choose, I'll
> definitely have a learning curve in front of me.  In terms of available
> training manuals, aftermarket do***entation, etc., Access is the
> front-runner, by far.
>
> I would appreciate any comments / thoughts from the Clarion users here.
> Also, in view of the fairly limited scope of my needs, I certainly
> should not need the latest and greatest version.  There are probably
> people in this group who have upgraded one or more times, and might have
> a fairly recent version of Clarion for sale.  If so, I would appreciate
> hearing from you.
>
> If location is significant, I'm in central Florida (Orlando area).
>
> Email, if you have a used version for sale, is "LRD at Lee-Reid dot com"
> -- does this keep the spammers from harvesting email addresses?
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Should I Use Clarion?
"L. R. Du Broff"  2008-02-13 19:20:01 
Re: Should I Use Clarion?
"Earl R Coker"   2008-02-14 00:22:51 
Re: Should I Use Clarion?
bnesheim <bnesheim@[EM  2008-02-19 01:44:18 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 16:30:00 CDT 2008.