Re: Opinions about a book

Keith Thompson <kst-u@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> [... Discussing the Intel compiler's C99 conformance ...]
>
>> I am quite impressed (with one tiny exception).  I tested the following
>> unlisted features:
>>
>>  * long double
<snip>

>> All seem OK at first glance.  A couple of tricky-to-parse compound
>> literal expressions also pass (I would have been surprised if they had
>> not).
> [snip]
>
> Why do you include long double on the list?

Not thinking, that's all!

-- 
Ben.