On Mon, 12 May 2008 20:49:47 -0400, CBFalconer
<cbfalconer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Flash Gordon wrote:
>>
>... snip ...
>>
>> You may well have done, and using a "safer" language may well have
>> helped, but these days if you re****ted that as your development process
>> on a safety critical project you would not be allowed to go live with
>> your SW until it had as a minimum undergone a complete review from the
>> requirements down to code and testing with the code also undergoing
>> professional static analysis, and from your description I don't think
>> even your requirements would pass (no risk analysis for a start).
>
>You are probably entirely right as far as general production is
>concerned. However I still maintain that I produced systems that
>were superior, both electrically (hardware) and in software than
>what is generally produced today.
95% of all drivers know themselves to be better than average
drivers. Equally well, 95% of all programmers know themselves to
be superior programmmers.
Richard Harter, cri@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.varinoma.com
Save the Earth now!!
It's the only planet with chocolate.
|
