Re: problem with output of the program on different OS

On May 13, 8:46 am, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> If I correct it by setting the missing parts of the complex numbers to
> 0 I get this:
>
> Es: 7.391785e-11 Ei: 1.112194e-04 RCS: 8.351773e+00
>
> which is exactly what gcc 4.2.3 and lcc-win32 give me.  It seems to be
> a bug of the most ordinary nature.
>
> > I was intrigued in why 1 compiler out of 4 gave a different result,
> > and tracked it down to this behaviour
>
> I am far from sure that you have.  Does the version you traced have
> uninitialised data and does the problem remain when you add the two
> extra zero initialisations?  If, so I will agree it looks odd, but so
> far it seems to be a common all-garden bug in the code.

Are you really getting this output on PellesC after fixing the bug?
What is the version ? I'm using PellesC 5.00.4 and it re****ts the same
value 1.11e+01