Programming > C > Re: c compilati...

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Post A New Topic

Post a Reply

Post 20 of 38 Topic 26135 of 26972

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

by roberson@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Walter Roberson) May 10, 2008 at 12:49 PM

In article <DYCGwVN6XZJIFATY@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Chris H  <chris@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Microsoft along with every other compiler INCLUDING GCC is at C95  with 
>SOME parts of C99 implemented.

>GCC is no more C99 than any other compiler.

In past posts, people have said that Comeau's compiler with
the Dinkumware libraries are true C99. Certainly dinkumware.com
advertises their library as being fully conforming to standard C99.
-- 
   "Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature."
   -- Rich Kulawiec

38 Posts in Topic:

c compilation - gcc vs visual c

kumarchi@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-05-09 12:20:19

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

jacob navia <jacob@[EM

2008-05-09 22:20:09

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Ulrich Eckhardt <dooms

2008-05-09 22:32:07

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

"Chris Thomasson&quo

2008-05-30 16:59:33

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

micans@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-05-09 13:38:04

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

kumarchi@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-05-09 14:03:14

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Ian Collins <ian-news@

2008-05-10 09:22:41

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

jacob navia <jacob@[EM

2008-05-09 23:50:30

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Niz <notarealemailaddr

2008-05-09 23:08:26

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

"cr88192" <c

2008-05-10 15:28:50

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

"Sean G. McLaughlin&

2008-05-10 17:30:35

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

moi <root@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-09 23:21:36

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Antoninus Twink <nospa

2008-05-10 00:13:19

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

"cr88192" <c

2008-05-10 08:41:39

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

kumarchi@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-05-09 17:59:22

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Willem <willem@[EMAIL

2008-05-10 06:20:09

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

William Ahern <william

2008-05-10 16:23:36

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

kumarchi@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-05-09 18:16:26

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-10 13:32:58

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

roberson@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-05-10 12:49:26

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

jacob navia <jacob@[EM

2008-05-10 17:41:23

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

kumarchi@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-05-10 09:49:58

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

"Sean G. McLaughlin&

2008-05-10 17:29:06

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

moi <root@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-10 19:18:18

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-10 18:58:15

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-10 19:00:47

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

kumarchi@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-05-10 12:13:38

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

kumarchi@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-05-10 12:29:47

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Rui Maciel <rui.maciel

2008-05-10 20:20:13

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Barry Schwarz <schwarz

2008-05-16 19:12:48

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Peter Nilsson <airia@[

2008-05-16 20:17:14

[OT] Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Tim Prince <tprince@[E

2008-05-16 23:30:55

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Walter Banks <walter@[

2008-05-17 05:29:18

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

CBFalconer <cbfalconer

2008-05-17 06:59:53

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Ben Bacarisse <ben.use

2008-05-18 14:00:22

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

kumarchi@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-05-30 09:09:43

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

Antoninus Twink <nospa

2008-05-30 19:34:08

Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

"robertwessel2@[EMAI

2008-05-30 17:12:30

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 21:44:55 CDT 2008.