Re: c compilation - gcc vs visual c

In message <g02blv$63d$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, jacob navia <jacob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
writes
>
>It is not surprising that gcc is slower than Microsoft since the
>people behind each project have vastly different objectives and
>budgets to implement them.
>
>Gcc is running in many platforms and architectures.
>Microsoft is running in one platform exclusively.

So  Gcc is not likely to be good on any platform as the people who 
develop for other platforms will specialise in that and beat GCC?


>Gcc implements standards like C99
CRAP

GCC implements GNU-c and adds extensions for SOME parts of C99

> (module small problems), Microsoft
>implements only Microsoft  environments (.net, etc). Microsoft is
>still at C89 level.

Microsoft along with every other compiler INCLUDING GCC is at C95  with 
SOME parts of C99 implemented.

GCC is no more C99 than any other compiler.

-- 
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills  Staffs  England     /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/