Re: lcc first experience

On 9 May, 17:34, Harald van D=A9=A6k <true...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 13:45:24 -0400, CBFalconer wrote:
> > If you ever actually try "-W -Wall -ansi -pedantic" on gcc, you will
> > discover that (barring possible errors) it doesn't embrace-and-extend.
>
> This translation unit is accepted without any diagnostic by gcc -W -Wall
-=

> ansi -pedantic:
>
> int __attribute__((const)) zero(void) { return 0; }

Not related to your point  but I tried the above code
with splint , c99 and c89 from Sun Studio 12. None
of the tools produced any warnings. To be precise
with the compilers (including gcc) you have to add
the -c option otherwise they complain about the lack
of main().