Re: [OT] lcc first experience

Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 13:45:24 -0400, CBFalconer wrote:
>> If you ever actually try "-W -Wall -ansi -pedantic" on gcc, you will
>> discover that (barring possible errors) it doesn't embrace-and-extend.
> 
> This translation unit is accepted without any diagnostic by gcc -W -Wall
-
> ansi -pedantic:
> 
> int __attribute__((const)) zero(void) { return 0; }
> 
> Does that mean the code is valid C, that this is an error in GCC, or
that 
> GCC does embrace-and-extend?

     No, no, and no, as I suspect you already no.

-- 
Eric Sosman
esosman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]