Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > C > Re: lcc first e...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 37 of 99 Topic 26092 of 26977
Post > Topic >>

Re: lcc first experience

by roberson@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Walter Roberson) May 9, 2008 at 02:07 AM

In article
<c8a99015-ca87-45b5-bd19-a9859ac8bc12@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 <muntyan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On May 8, 3:11 pm, rober...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Walter Roberson)
>wrote:
>> In article
<c3cb0c48-bc72-4b53-af6b-c9b3223c5...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,

>>  <munt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >"Communicate" thing ends after first three lines of the "2+2=4"
>> >essay. The rest ten pages of stuff full of quotes from the C
>> >standard and anecdotes about I-wont-tell-name are what I call
>> >bull****, and what Jacob calls "playing with words".

>> Are we reading the same postings?? The closest thing I can find
>> to an anecdote in the message that Jacob was replying to was when
>> I wrote,

>"One of the semi-regular posters here takes pains to make a
>distinction, of great im****tance to him..."

Check the ordering on the messages. My note about person who
distinguishes between functions and procedures was in reply to Jacob's
reply to my message. So what Jacob was replying to contained no
anecdotes.

>>> anecdotes about I-wont-tell-name

"I-wont-tell-name" ?? I never took particular note of the name of
that particular person. There are a number of people I remember clearly
enough to be fairly sure it was -not- them, but I don't cross-reference
everyone's peculiarities (and I doubt anyone considers me im****tant
enough to bother to cross-reference -my- pecularities.)

The paragraph about the poster who makes the distinction noted, was
in illustration of the fact that there are posters here who employ
(and expect others to understand and employ) words in senses
other than the senses of those words that are defined by the C standard.
The paragraph was written to show how it was indeed reasonable
for me -not- to know what Paul meant. Even now, after Paul has
indicated that he "made a boo-boo", I find that I have no idea
what notion he was trying to convey in that particular phrase.

It wasn't a case of "I'm going to pretend I don't understand because
that's not what the standard says": it was a case of "I can't think
of -any- reasonable interpretation of that phrase that could be
considered correct." -You- might have thought that I was
"playing with words" or "bull-****ing", but I know that -I- was
thinking of neither of those things at the time I was writing those
postings.
-- 
'Roberson' is my family name; my given name is 'Walter'.
 




 99 Posts in Topic:
[OT] lcc first experience
Morris Dovey <mrdovey@  2008-05-06 12:33:06 
Re: lcc first experience
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tom=E1s_=D  2008-05-06 10:41:28 
Re: lcc first experience
Morris Dovey <mrdovey@  2008-05-06 13:02:55 
Re: lcc first experience
Johannes Bauer <dfnson  2008-05-06 20:51:07 
Re: lcc first experience
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tom=E1s_=D  2008-05-06 15:35:32 
Re: lcc first experience
Antoninus Twink <nospa  2008-05-06 20:10:35 
Re: lcc first experience
Morris Dovey <mrdovey@  2008-05-06 13:21:40 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Keith Thompson <kst-u@  2008-05-06 11:19:10 
Re: lcc first experience
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tom=E1s_=D  2008-05-06 11:47:38 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Morris Dovey <mrdovey@  2008-05-06 13:49:09 
Re: lcc first experience
Paul Hsieh <websnarf@[  2008-05-07 10:52:56 
Re: lcc first experience
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2008-05-07 13:58:53 
Re: lcc first experience
dj3vande@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 18:41:15 
Re: lcc first experience
Spiros Bousbouras <spi  2008-05-08 11:20:03 
Re: lcc first experience
muntyan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-08 12:49:22 
Re: lcc first experience
roberson@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-08 20:11:47 
Re: lcc first experience
muntyan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-08 19:31:19 
Re: lcc first experience
Richard Heathfield <rj  2008-05-09 05:25:35 
Re: lcc first experience
jacob navia <jacob@[EM  2008-05-09 08:44:45 
Re: lcc first experience
Richard Heathfield <rj  2008-05-09 07:35:23 
Re: lcc first experience
roberson@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-09 14:59:38 
Re: lcc first experience
Nick Keighley <nick_ke  2008-05-09 01:48:41 
Re: lcc first experience
Spiros Bousbouras <spi  2008-05-08 16:17:14 
Re: lcc first experience
richard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-08 23:45:58 
Re: lcc first experience
Nick Keighley <nick_ke  2008-05-09 01:50:59 
Re: lcc first experience
richard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-09 12:00:03 
Re: lcc first experience
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-07 17:48:52 
Re: lcc first experience
cri@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2008-05-08 02:30:57 
Re: lcc first experience
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-08 13:40:41 
Re: lcc first experience
cri@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2008-05-10 04:39:47 
Re: lcc first experience
Paul Hsieh <websnarf@[  2008-05-08 09:55:08 
Re: lcc first experience
roberson@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-08 17:37:05 
Re: lcc first experience
jacob navia <jacob@[EM  2008-05-08 19:42:31 
Re: lcc first experience
roberson@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-08 18:28:31 
Re: lcc first experience
Keith Thompson <kst-u@  2008-05-08 11:55:57 
Re: lcc first experience
muntyan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-08 15:13:58 
Re: lcc first experience
roberson@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-09 02:07:23 
Re: lcc first experience
Paul Hsieh <websnarf@[  2008-05-08 13:24:45 
Re: lcc first experience
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2008-05-08 17:20:45 
Re: lcc first experience
jacob navia <jacob@[EM  2008-05-09 07:43:41 
Re: lcc first experience
Richard Heathfield <rj  2008-05-09 05:54:58 
Re: lcc first experience
roberson@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-09 03:31:44 
Re: lcc first experience
richard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-08 21:02:02 
Re: lcc first experience
richard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-08 21:08:29 
Re: lcc first experience
Keith Thompson <kst-u@  2008-05-08 15:15:32 
Re: lcc first experience
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-08 19:04:25 
Re: lcc first experience
Keith Thompson <kst-u@  2008-05-08 22:40:25 
Re: lcc first experience
vippstar@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-08 14:44:50 
Re: lcc first experience
Spiros Bousbouras <spi  2008-05-08 16:09:33 
Re: lcc first experience
Eric Sosman <esosman@[  2008-05-08 21:14:14 
Re: lcc first experience
Nick Keighley <nick_ke  2008-05-09 01:19:55 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
jacob navia <jacob@[EM  2008-05-06 20:26:59 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
"Malcolm McLean"  2008-05-06 21:48:31 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
nembo kid <user@[EMAIL  2008-05-07 17:51:45 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
roberson@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 16:03:30 
Re: lcc first experience
vippstar@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 09:24:27 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Morris Dovey <mrdovey@  2008-05-07 12:06:24 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Joe Wright <joewwright  2008-05-07 16:28:29 
Re: lcc first experience
Bart <bc@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-07 13:59:16 
Re: lcc first experience
jacob navia <jacob@[EM  2008-05-08 00:55:56 
Re: lcc first experience
Eric Sosman <esosman@[  2008-05-07 20:32:37 
Re: lcc first experience
Keith Thompson <kst-u@  2008-05-07 18:26:14 
binary literals (was Re: lcc first experience)
Chris Torek <nospam@[E  2008-05-08 02:18:14 
Re: lcc first experience
"Dik T. Winter"  2008-05-08 10:12:38 
Re: lcc first experience
richard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-08 10:36:25 
Re: lcc first experience
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-07 20:26:31 
Re: binary literals (was Re: lcc first experience)
Ben Bacarisse <ben.use  2008-05-08 12:14:32 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
rlb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2008-05-08 06:29:24 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-08 13:45:24 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
rlb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2008-05-16 10:37:27 
Re: lcc first experience
Spiros Bousbouras <spi  2008-05-09 11:42:36 
Re: lcc first experience
Spiros Bousbouras <spi  2008-05-09 11:53:06 
Re: lcc first experience
Old Wolf <oldwolf@[EMA  2008-05-11 16:03:04 
Re: lcc first experience
Antoninus Twink <nospa  2008-05-09 11:42:57 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSz  2008-05-09 18:34:51 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
jacob navia <jacob@[EM  2008-05-09 19:23:54 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Morris Dovey <mrdovey@  2008-05-09 12:29:04 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
jacob navia <jacob@[EM  2008-05-09 20:03:18 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Morris Dovey <mrdovey@  2008-05-09 13:58:26 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
rlb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2008-05-16 10:38:37 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Eric Sosman <esosman@[  2008-05-09 13:39:04 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
jacob navia <jacob@[EM  2008-05-09 19:59:38 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Eric Sosman <esosman@[  2008-05-09 17:10:52 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Eric Sosman <esosman@[  2008-05-10 17:04:50 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Richard Heathfield <rj  2008-05-09 17:51:42 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
jacob navia <jacob@[EM  2008-05-09 19:56:19 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Flash Gordon <spam@[EM  2008-05-09 19:33:22 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Keith Thompson <kst-u@  2008-05-09 13:03:38 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Flash Gordon <spam@[EM  2008-05-09 18:27:59 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSz  2008-05-09 20:25:29 
Re: lcc first experience
Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSz  2008-05-09 20:52:51 
Re: lcc first experience
Antoninus Twink <nospa  2008-05-09 20:55:58 
Re: lcc first experience
"Malcolm McLean"  2008-05-11 10:09:21 
Re: lcc first experience
Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSz  2008-05-09 21:06:34 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-09 16:53:05 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Antoninus Twink <nospa  2008-05-09 23:41:13 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSz  2008-05-09 23:50:09 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Ben Bacarisse <ben.use  2008-05-10 03:28:11 
Re: [OT] lcc first experience
Antoninus Twink <nospa  2008-05-10 23:32:59 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 3:51:10 CDT 2008.