Re: lcc first experience

jacob navia wrote:
> Bart wrote:
>
.... snip about binary constants ...
> 
> This is just a facvility to users. As Mr Dovey proved, it is
> VERY easy to get it wrong! It is the best to do it automatically.
> 
>> Or, C programmers say to use hexadecimal instead!
>>
>> lcc-win32 appears to have this 'extension' (if it's even that
>> because it's so trivial to implement), the problem being that
>> the code won't then compile anywhere else.
> 
> I do not know why this is not used elsewhere.

Simple.  Because it is not required by the standard.

-- 
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) 
 [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
            Try the download section.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**