Programming > C > Re: pointer to ...

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Post A New Topic

Post a Reply

Post 11 of 13 Topic 26086 of 26972

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

by Peter Nilsson <airia@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 7, 2008 at 03:30 PM

Richard Bos wrote:
> BTW, I still don't understand why we have both intptr_t and
> uintptr_t. We really only need either of those.

Because of 6.2.5p6, "For each of the signed integer types,
there is a corresponding (but different) unsigned integer..."

--
Peter

13 Posts in Topic:

pointer to integer to pointer conversions

lithiumcat@[EMAIL PROTECT

2008-05-06 05:05:39

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

vippstar@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-05-06 05:34:20

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

Eric Sosman <esosman@[

2008-05-06 08:37:09

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

rlb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R

2008-05-07 08:17:12

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

"Stephen Sprunk"

2008-05-07 16:37:01

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

Keith Thompson <kst-u@

2008-05-07 15:45:19

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

lithiumcat@[EMAIL PROTECT

2008-05-06 08:33:00

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

Keith Thompson <kst-u@

2008-05-06 12:46:11

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

Flash Gordon <spam@[EM

2008-05-06 21:42:38

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

vippstar@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-05-07 06:54:46

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

Peter Nilsson <airia@[

2008-05-07 15:30:26

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

rlb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R

2008-05-08 12:52:49

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

Peter Nilsson <airia@[

2008-05-07 15:44:02

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 16:07:33 CDT 2008.