Re: Problem with SYS_mount

In article <fvrkpv$mim$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Sam Joseph  <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>I don't understand the silly squabble that devlopped in this thread - 
>this is computer world, not an arts subject... there's no gray area, 
>either something's right (in which case what's the use in saying it's 
>wrong, when this can be easily checked), or it's wrong (in which case 
>just correct it).

The material provided by Mr. Twink in his or her first reply was
*completely* incorrect on at least 3 systems I have personally had
access to, and my research the other day found that it was incorrect
for at least one of the major branches of Unix. Your
"just correct it" idea would require scowering over several hundreds 
of implementations and providing the corrected answer for each of them.

System-specific answers should simply not be provided here, especially
without firm statements of which systems they are specific to.
-- 
  "I want to be remembered as the guy who gave his all whenever
  he was on the field."                       -- Walter Payton