Re: Problem with SYS_mount

Sam Joseph wrote:
> 
> Brilliant, just what I was looking for! Thanks.
> 
> I don't understand the silly squabble that devlopped in this thread
> - this is computer world, not an arts subject... there's no gray
> area, either something's right (in which case what's the use in
> saying it's wrong, when this can be easily checked), or it's wrong
> (in which case just correct it).

The point is that the group deals with standard C as defined in the
various C standards.  Other material is off-topic, and there is no
reason to assume any readers here will (or can) correct it if
erroneous.

Please do not top-post.  Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all
irrelevant material.  See the following links:

  <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
  <http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>
  <http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>
  <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>
 (taming google)
  <http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/>
 (newusers)

-- 
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) 
 [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
            Try the download section.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**