Re: Problem with SYS_mount

In article <fvrkpv$mim$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Sam Joseph  <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>Brilliant, just what I was looking for! Thanks.
>
>I don't understand the silly squabble that devlopped in this thread - 
>this is computer world, not an arts subject... there's no gray area, 
>either something's right (in which case what's the use in saying it's 
>wrong, when this can be easily checked), or it's wrong (in which case 
>just correct it).

Welcome to CLC!

Bottom line here is: Despite the name, this newsgroup (comp.lang.c) is
not about computers or technology.  So, a lot of your basic assumptions
about, as you put it "computer world", do not apply here.

Rather, this is a newsgroup devoted to a particular species of theology.
It is only in the realm of theology that you see people with a deep,
vested interest in believing things that simply aren't so (with a tip of
the hat to Mark Twain).  Hence, the endless arguments between the
Establishment (intent on perpetuating the belief in and acceptance of
the theology) and the skeptics (those in the so-called "reality-based
community").  Since there is no resolution to this problem (neither side
is willing to concede any territory), the debate will go on forever.