Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > C > Re: pointer to ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 13 Topic 26086 of 26955
Post > Topic >>

Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions

by Keith Thompson <kst-u@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 6, 2008 at 12:46 PM

lithiumcat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:
> Thanks you all for your answers, they were really helpful. It seems
> that 6.3.2.3 wasn't all.
>
> Although it's quite off-topic, could you tell me what that
> "ISO/IEC 1999:TC3" is worth? Can I take it as a reference? If so, is
> there a similar reference for C89?

I presume you're referring to n1256.pdf, available at
<http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf>.

That's not a completely official do***ent, but it's good enough for
most practical purposes.  It includes the offical C99 standard plus
the changes made by the three Technical Corrigenda.  Any changes
introduced by the TCs are marked with change bars.  It's what I use
most of the time.

If you want something absolutely official, you can get a copy of the
C99 standard itself (without the TCs) by paying money to your national
standards body.  I got mine from ANSI for something like $18; I think
it's gone up slightly since then.  You should be able to get TC1, TC2,
and TC3 from the same source at no charge.  Flipping back and forth
between the C99 standard and the changes in the TCs is tedious --
which is why n1256.pdf is so handy.

Good copies of the C89/C90 standard are a bit harder to come by.  I
have a poor-quality PDF copy that I bought from ANSI for $18, but I
don't think it's available anymore.  Some pre-C89 drafts are freely
available; I expect that someone will post URLs any minute now.

At least one person here prefers (I think it's) n869.txt.  This is a
pre-C99 draft, *not* a C89/C90 draft.  It has the advantage that it's
in plain text rather than PDF.  It has the disadvantage that it's in
plain text rather than PDF.  In particular, some semantically
significant formatting, particularly the use if italics, is lost --
and there were some changes between n869 and the final C99 standard.
I don't recommend it unless you have serious problems dealing with PDF
do***ents.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) <kst-u@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Nokia
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
 




 13 Posts in Topic:
pointer to integer to pointer conversions
lithiumcat@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-06 05:05:39 
Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions
vippstar@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-06 05:34:20 
Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions
Eric Sosman <esosman@[  2008-05-06 08:37:09 
Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions
rlb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2008-05-07 08:17:12 
Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions
"Stephen Sprunk"  2008-05-07 16:37:01 
Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions
Keith Thompson <kst-u@  2008-05-07 15:45:19 
Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions
lithiumcat@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-06 08:33:00 
Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions
Keith Thompson <kst-u@  2008-05-06 12:46:11 
Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions
Flash Gordon <spam@[EM  2008-05-06 21:42:38 
Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions
vippstar@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 06:54:46 
Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions
Peter Nilsson <airia@[  2008-05-07 15:30:26 
Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions
rlb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2008-05-08 12:52:49 
Re: pointer to integer to pointer conversions
Peter Nilsson <airia@[  2008-05-07 15:44:02 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 2:17:17 CDT 2008.