Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > C > Re: type-punnin...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 16 Topic 26091 of 26960
Post > Topic >>

Re: type-punning?

by Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSzaw==?= <truedfx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 6, 2008 at 07:35 PM

On Tue, 06 May 2008 09:43:53 -0700, vippstar wrote:
> On May 6, 6:46 pm, j.j.fish...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>>
>> static int punme(void** dat,size_t newsize) {
>>   void *newdat = realloc(*dat,newsize);
>>
>>   if (! newdat) return 1;
>>
>>   *dat = newdat;
>>
>>   return 0;
>>
>> }
>>
>> int main (void)
>> {
>>   char *dat = malloc(30);
>>
>>   int ret = punme((void**)&dat,40);
>>
>>   printf("punme returns %i\n",ret);
>>
>>   return 0;}

Heh, this looks familiar. :)

>> My compiler (gcc -Wall -O3) tells me that "typepun.c:19: warning:
>> dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules". 
>> The code works as expected, ie, prints that punme returns 0.
>>
>> Who is the idiot? Me or the compiler?
> You (cast) and assign a char ** to a void **. void ** is not like void
> *.
> Fixed your code:
>> static int punme(void* dat,size_t newsize) { void **tmp = dat;
>> void *newdat = realloc(*tmp, newsize);

This doesn't fix the problem. This merely reorganises the code in a form 
that the compiler may happen to not warn about.

The problem is that dat is defined as char *. You can't pretend it's 
defined as a void *. The language doesn't let you. A fixed version looks 
like

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>

static void *punme(void *dat, size_t newsize) {
  return realloc(dat, newsize);
}

int main (void)
{
  char *dat = malloc(30);
  char *newdat = punme(dat, 40); /* or call realloc directly */
  if (newdat != NULL) dat = newdat;
  printf("punme would have returned %d\n", (newdat == NULL ? 1 : 0));
  return 0;
}
 




 16 Posts in Topic:
type-punning?
j.j.fishbat@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-06 08:46:00 
Re: type-punning?
vippstar@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-06 09:43:53 
Re: type-punning?
Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSz  2008-05-06 19:35:00 
Re: type-punning?
Andrey Tarasevich <and  2008-05-06 11:05:25 
Re: type-punning?
lawrence.jones@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-06 14:39:47 
Re: type-punning?
j.j.fishbat@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-06 11:17:38 
Re: type-punning?
Andrey Tarasevich <and  2008-05-06 11:24:55 
Re: type-punning?
Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSz  2008-05-06 20:32:01 
Re: type-punning?
Kenneth Brody <kenbrod  2008-05-06 14:34:57 
Re: type-punning?
Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSz  2008-05-06 20:50:08 
Re: type-punning?
j.j.fishbat@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-06 11:56:36 
Re: type-punning?
Kenneth Brody <kenbrod  2008-05-06 16:26:19 
Re: type-punning?
Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@  2008-05-06 14:02:24 
Re: type-punning?
Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSz  2008-05-06 23:11:51 
Re: type-punning?
"Default User"   2008-05-06 22:49:07 
Re: type-punning?
Ben Bacarisse <ben.use  2008-05-06 22:17:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 16:34:23 CDT 2008.