Re: ****tability: Harmony between PC and microcontroller

On May 6, 10:49=A0am, Tom=E1s =D3 h=C9ilidhe <t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> I'd love to actually have to take a trial of it. I'd love to have you
> sit down in a room with a desk and a chair and my machine running the
> ****ted webbrowser. I'd love to see you type in "google.ie" and wait 7
> minutes for it to load.

Pointless.

> Nintendo was an arbitrary choice on my part by the way.
> (Also, the "daemon" is the program that runs on the server, not the
> client. The daemon listens on a ****t number, e.g. ****t 80 for HTTP,
> and processes requests to that ****t number).

Sorry. Didn't get the browser in your text, and didn't realize someone
typing a url with a joystick. I am not a game player.

> I'm talking about getting optimal performance out of every system,
> whether it runs at 31 kHz or 3.6 Ghz.

Nonsense. Aren't you the guy who "...lose the plot if had to wait one
minute for a page to load, let alone seven...."? Can you build the
same browser, with the same code, to this 2 machines? Do you think
that is the best product? Shouldnt the 31khz guy use (sample) linx and
the 3Ghz one use whatever he like (including linx)?

If performance was the only issue, why shold one have to use something
****table or standard? Or either keep the 8 bit platform? Hack around
my friend. You cannot answer all the worlds questions with a single
answer. Each system demand his own way to deal with the same problems.
If you try to build a web browser to run in a (sample) nintendo and in
a PC, you will need to "****t" something. Maybe everything.

> They work great if used properly.
Where? For what? By who? When? How? Answer that to have a percent of
the meaning of "properly".

Regards
Rafael