Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem in Vista

jacob navia <jacob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> Nick Keighley wrote:
>> I don't think there is anything wrong with chargeing money
>> for software.
>
> OK. I was just paranoiac
>
>> Perhaps you should dial down the attitude a bit?
>
> Excuse me.
>
> But there are (specially in this group) people that
> always attack me because I try to sell some parts of my
> own work. So  I get paranoiac.

Yes, you do, and this wasn't the only time.

For example, somebody recently pointed out a bug in lcc-win (it
declares "wtof" in <stdlib.h>, causing a legal program that uses that
identifier to fail).  Your response was to flame many of the people
who mentioned it.  You still haven't acknowledged that it's a problem.
There were also some questions about the "-ansic89" option, to which
you never gave a straight answer (doing so probably would have quickly
ended the argument).

This is *not* intended as an attack, jacob.  I am asking you to sit
back for a moment and think about how you react to criticism.  Yes,
some people do dislike you, but not everyone who criticizes you or
your compiler does so out of personal dislike.

One of the most valuable resources a programmer can have is a
community of experts eager to find bugs in his code.  You have that
here, but you seem determined to reject it.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) <kst-u@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Nokia
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"