Re: Dev-C++ compiling problem in Vista

Ian Collins wrote:
> jacob navia wrote:
>> Ian Collins wrote:
>>> jacob navia wrote:
>>>> Ian Collins wrote:
>>>>> jacob navia wrote:
>>>>>> Bill Buckels wrote:
>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>> Well Microsoft and C have both fed my family and friends for about
30
>>>>>>> years now evn though they may seem mutually exclusive like
Military
>>>>>>> Intelligence, so I don't exactly get your point. 
>>>>>> Selling software under Linux is impossible, at least for
>>>>>> developers like most of us. 
>>>>> Try telling that the the embedded tool suppliers.
>>>>>
>>>> They do not sell any software under linux. They sell
>>>> a development system with linux, what is completely another
>>>> thing.
>>>>
>>> No, the likes of Green Hills sell compilers and tools that run on
Linux
>>> (as well as Solaris and windows).  I know, I paid them $60K + sup****t
in
>>> my last job!
>>>
>> But their compilers are cross compilers for the embedded system
>> they are sup****ting!
>>
> They also have native compilers, but I see your point.  I wonder how
> many compilers Intel sell?
> 
>> (And please do not start with a long list of crappy IDEs because
>> IDEs that are able to call "make" and call gdb are there by the
>> thousands. None will sup****t "go to definition", real debugging
>> etc. I tested dozens of them when I had to use linux.
>>
> I don't think Eclipse of NetBeans (neither tied to one platform) can be
> described as crappy.
> 

Strange, I thought both were free... How much does Eclipse cost?

What is the selling price of "NetBeans"?

I think you just confirm what I said. No software can be sold under
linux.

As IDEs goes, both of those software package are usable, of course,
since they have SUN/IBM behind them, that poured millions of
dollars into their development.

And both of them never go into 20% of what visual studio does.

Eclipse just calls gdb, and is happy with it

-- 
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32