Re: Problem with SYS_mount

Richard Tobin wrote:
> In article <689fpiF2qkckmU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Ian Collins  <ian-news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> That the problem, isn't it?  "as far as I can tell" isn't good enough,
>> post here you might get one opinion, post in the correct place, you
will
>> get informed answers.
> 
> There's a better chance of accurate answers (and wrong answers being
> corrected) in a Linux group, which is why I said it would make more
> sense to ask there.
> 
> But I was responding to Eric accusation, not to the original poster.
> Eric made his accusation here in comp.lang.c, and I don't see why it
> should go unchallenged just because he posted it in this newsgroup.
> 
Well in standard C (this is c.l.c, right?) terms,

asmlinkage long sys_mount(char __user *dev_name, char __user* dir_name,
  char __user *type, unsigned long flags, void __user *data);

is Drivel.  Nonsense.  Idiocy!

-- 
Ian Collins.