Re: Implementation-defined behaviour

Richard wrote:
> 
> Ioannis Vranos <ivranos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> 
> > Kenny McCormack wrote:
> >>
> >> And:
> >>
> >> 1) How to declare main()  { Always a hit! }
> >
> > Easy. Under C90:
> >
> > int main(), int main(void), int main(int argc, char *argv[]), int
> > main(int argc, char **argv), and those also with no return type
> > (implicit int).
> >
> >
> >> 2) Why not to cast the return value of *alloc()
> >>
> >> That's it folks.  Enjoy!
> >
> >
> > malloc() doesn't need a cast in C, it needs in C++,
> > because in C there is implicit conversion of void *
> > to any other pointer type, but not in
> > C++ where it requires a cast.
> 
> I think you miss the point.

Nope. He didn't miss the point. You did.

> Kenny was being sarcastic because

Nobody cares about that.
That's the point.

-- 
pete