Re: signal catching not work

jgd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (John Dallman) writes:
> In article <clcm-20080416-0002@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, cong818@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Terry) 
> wrote:
>> The code is supposed to catch two segment fault, but the second is
>> always missing on my machine. Could anyone tell me why this code
>> doesn't work as expected?
>
> Signal handlers registered with simple signal() only work once, by 
> design. You have to re-register them in the signal handler, or use a 
> more sophisticated interface to signals. 

Actually, I think it's implementation-defined whether signal() works
this way or not.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) <kst-u@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Nokia
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
-- 
comp.lang.c.moderated - moderation address: clcm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- you must
have an appropriate newsgroups line in your header for your mail to be
seen,
or the newsgroup name in square brackets in the subject line.  Sorry.