Re: Unpredictable result of Increment operation

James Kanze dixit:
> On May 9, 2:54 am, "Victor Bazarov" <v.Abaza...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Ian Collins wrote:
>>> bintom wrote:
>>>> Is there any reason why the following C++ code behaves as it does ?
> 
>>>> int i;
> 
>>>> i=1;  cout << (++i)++;           Output: 2
> 
>>> Because it's nonsensical undefined behaviour.
> 
>> Why is it non-sensical?  Why is it undefined?
> 
> Because the standard says so.  You're modifying the same object
> twice without an intervening sequence point.

Can you tell what is an intervening sequence point ?

Thanks