On May 7, 2:48 pm, "Victor Bazarov" <v.Abaza...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
[...]
> Uh... How to break it to ya... There are _literally_ scores
> of different compilers out there. "C++ developers over here"
> use all of them. Half of those compilers have their main
> module named 'cc' (or something very close).
Actually, I don't know of any C++ compilers that are invoked by
cc: I've got CC, g++ and cl here, with xlC and acc on some
machines I've used in the past. Under Unix, cc is classically
used to invoke the C compiler, so can't be the C++ compiler.
(As for the rest, of course... We need a minimum compilable
example. I don't know of any compiler that just randomly
defines macros, so obviously, it's being defined somewhere.
Also, of course, using conditional compilation to change the
layout of a structure is just looking for trouble. And is
totally unmaintainable.)
--
James Kanze (GABI Software) email:james.kanze@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
en informatique orient=E9e objet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9 place S=E9mard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l'=C9cole, France, +33 (0)1 30 23 00 34
|
