by Jerry Coffin <jcoffin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 8, 2008 at 07:07 PM
In article <2QAUj.87$gd3.79@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
[ ... ]
> What exactly do you need that copy constructor and assignment operator
> for? They are doing exactly what the default ones would do. They are
> useless.
You're right -- I should have pointed out that I was including them only
for emphasis, but they're only doing what the compiler would generate if
they weren't included.
--
Later,
Jerry.
The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
