Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > C++ > Re: equality op...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 45 Topic 45751 of 47006
Post > Topic >>

Re: equality operator question

by ram@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefan Ram) May 7, 2008 at 10:02 PM

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Pascal J. Bourguignon) writes:
>it's harder to read boolean expression when

  Now I remember one boolean expression that was really harder
  to read than other boolean expressions.

  In a Java program (off topic here, but just to show how sane
  C++ is in comparison), I once came across:

            if (a[i] != a[i]) 

  It took me several seconds to remember how this might be true
  in Java (Hint: it has nothing to do with the array access, the
  same effect can be seen with »if( a != a )«.)

  If the reader knows Java, but also does not understand this
  expression immediately, this would prove that it is hard to read.

  (Another hint: The type of the operands of »!=« is »double«.)
 




 45 Posts in Topic:
equality operator question
"barcaroller" &  2008-05-04 22:40:28 
Re: equality operator question
Jack Klein <jackklein@  2008-05-04 21:51:54 
Re: equality operator question
"Jim Langston"   2008-05-05 02:51:12 
Re: equality operator question
"kwikius" <a  2008-05-05 11:58:28 
Re: equality operator question
James Kanze <james.kan  2008-05-05 06:19:44 
Re: equality operator question
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-05-05 15:28:16 
Re: equality operator question
James Kanze <james.kan  2008-05-05 07:12:07 
Re: equality operator question
Krice <paulkp@[EMAIL P  2008-05-05 07:48:06 
Re: equality operator question
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-05-05 17:07:23 
Re: equality operator question
Eberhard Schefold <eba  2008-05-06 08:02:24 
Re: equality operator question
Pete Becker <pete@[EMA  2008-05-06 06:53:14 
Re: equality operator question
=?UTF-8?B?RXJpayBXaWtzdHL  2008-05-06 16:08:43 
Re: equality operator question
"kwikius" <a  2008-05-06 17:32:37 
Re: equality operator question
Pete Becker <pete@[EMA  2008-05-06 13:39:06 
Re: equality operator question
Eberhard Schefold <ebe  2008-05-06 19:46:31 
Re: equality operator question
"Bo Persson" &l  2008-05-06 20:00:21 
Re: equality operator question
Pete Becker <pete@[EMA  2008-05-06 15:18:44 
Re: equality operator question
=?UTF-8?B?RXJpayBXaWtzdHL  2008-05-06 18:17:40 
Re: equality operator question
ram@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (S  2008-05-07 22:02:04 
Re: equality operator question
Jerry Coffin <jcoffin@  2008-05-07 22:38:59 
Re: equality operator question
Pete Becker <pete@[EMA  2008-05-05 12:32:00 
Re: equality operator question
peter koch <peter.koch  2008-05-05 11:08:13 
Re: equality operator question
Krice <paulkp@[EMAIL P  2008-05-05 15:33:29 
Re: equality operator question
Pete Becker <pete@[EMA  2008-05-05 20:36:41 
Re: equality operator question
"barcaroller" &  2008-05-05 23:01:32 
Re: equality operator question
Christian Hackl <hacki  2008-05-06 09:34:51 
Re: equality operator question
Pete Becker <pete@[EMA  2008-05-06 06:49:33 
Re: equality operator question
Krice <paulkp@[EMAIL P  2008-05-05 23:58:01 
Re: equality operator question
Pete Becker <pete@[EMA  2008-05-06 06:52:13 
Re: equality operator question
James Kanze <james.kan  2008-05-06 03:04:22 
Re: equality operator question
Eberhard Schefold <ebe  2008-05-06 16:04:19 
Re: equality operator question
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-05-06 16:23:15 
Re: equality operator question
Eberhard Schefold <ebe  2008-05-06 16:35:26 
Re: equality operator question
ram@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (S  2008-05-06 14:48:53 
Re: equality operator question
Eberhard Schefold <ebe  2008-05-06 17:13:01 
Re: equality operator question
James Kanze <james.kan  2008-05-06 03:09:18 
Re: equality operator question
James Kanze <james.kan  2008-05-06 05:06:53 
Re: equality operator question
Nick Keighley <nick_ke  2008-05-06 09:06:24 
Re: equality operator question
Krice <paulkp@[EMAIL P  2008-05-06 11:50:27 
Re: equality operator question
James Kanze <james.kan  2008-05-07 01:53:25 
Re: equality operator question
ram@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (S  2008-05-07 15:16:59 
Re: equality operator question
James Kanze <james.kan  2008-05-09 04:34:21 
Re: equality operator question
Lionel B <me@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-06 14:31:59 
Re: equality operator question
Eberhard Schefold <ebe  2008-05-06 16:36:25 
Re: equality operator question
Lionel B <me@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 09:08:00 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 1:53:43 CDT 2008.