by Stephan Ceram <linuxkaffee_@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 7, 2008 at 05:28 PM
> I wonder, why all those questions? Did it have anything to do
> with the problem the OP experienced? Generally speaking, the
> link error (this is what the OP's got, isn't it?) is because it
> is a function template that is used in 'main' and its source is
> not visible so that the compiler can generate the function. But
> the design has really nothing to do with it, does it? Simply
> tell the OP to place the definition in the header.
That's my point. But when I place the definition into the header
which I want to make visible to other users as API to my library,
also the definition of A::func becomes visible to everyone. And
this is what I would like to avoid. This was the reason of my post
to ask you if there are any solution to not change the semantics
of my code example but still somehow keep the definition of A::func
hidden.
Regards,
