Re: Compiler ordering barriers in C++0x

On May 2, 12:43 pm, Anthony Williams <anthony_w....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> [...]
> All accesses to shared data MUST be synchronized with atomics: [...]

Can you elaborate this point please. How can you generally synchronise
N processes with help of atomics? Do you mean only two processes under
certain cir***stances?

Best would be if you give an example for it.

Thanks for your help.

Best Regards,
Szabolcs


-- 
      [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm
for info about ]
      [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]