Re: Macro To Generate Inline Assembly

On 29 Apr., 07:23, Le Chaud Lapin <jaibudu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> If the reasons for adding __asm to C++ were listed in order of
> im****tance, I'd say speed up of critical operations would be in the
> top 10. :)

What should we do with __asm? We already have asm - as
shown in my previous answer - it was reserved as a keyword
by Our Holy Standard and it is really a shame that no compiler
writer sup****ts it (This is of course a provocative statement,
because
I would like to hear any counter examples ;-)).

Greetings from Bremen,

Daniel Krügler


-- 
      [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm
for info about ]
      [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]