Re: String literal as template parameter?

On Apr 18, 1:09 pm, Alberto Ganesh Barbati <AlbertoBarb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> Piotr Rak ha scritto:
>
> > For brave people, patch against gcc trunk, revision 134411
> >http://doppler.no-ip.org/~prak/fstring-template-arguments.patch
>
> Thanks! Now it's time to prepare a formal proposal. Let me help you with
> that.
>

It is probably too late for proposing a stand alone addition to the
committee, but if you could reduce the amount of wording needed to
specify this extension as much as possible, maybe you can have some
one (like the original author of variadic templates, IIRC it was
Douglas Gregor), to sneak it to the committee as an 'obivious small
fix' to what has already been accepted.

Good luck, I think that this would be a great addition to the standard
(Yay for real embedded DSLs!).

(BTW, the patch is impressively small, great job!)

--
Giovanni P. Deretta

-- 
      [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm
for info about ]
      [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]