Re: String literal as template parameter?

On Apr 17, 7:35 pm, Piotr Rak <piotr....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> But overall, it should be enough to see how it feels.
>
> I am not sure if default template arguments should be sup****ted ie:
>
> template <char... Chars_ = "Oink!">
> struct Foo;

Default arguments aren't permitted on variadic parameters,
unfortunately, so the question is moot.

> Comments welcome :)
>
> Note that, this was first time i've seen gcc sources...

Well, you certainly did better than I would have... that looks like a
solid patch, but in reality I'm deathly affraid of the GCC sources.

This is very good that you've made this patch; it means that we are
very likely to be able to get this into C++0x, and if not, then as a
GCC extension. You should try and see if you can get this into the
next release (I'm not experienced enough with GCC development to tell
you how to do that).

> For brave people, patch against gcc trunk, revision
134411http://doppler.no-ip.org/~prak/fstring-template-arguments.patch
>
> Piotr Rak

Awesome!

Sean Hunt

-- 
      [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm
for info about ]
      [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]